World Watch Today

Shocking Marriage Statistics

The Latest Census Bureau reports that less than half of Americans now live in a married-coupled household. This is a truly shocking statistic—never before in America’s history have we seen such a decline in marriage. In the 1950’s 78 percent of all households consisted of married couples, today only 48 percent of households consist of married couples.

Who is hurt the most by this change in culture? Children suffer terribly in an anti-marriage culture. Poverty is much greater for children living with a divorce, single or living together parent. The poverty rate is 37% for single parents with children, but only 6 % for married couples with children.

The marriage attacks began in the 1960’s and picked up steam in the 70’s. The anti-marriage rush started with states embracing no-fault divorce (government in essence supporting easy divorce). Then came the Supreme Court legalizing abortion (men dodging responsibility for pregnancy). And then Hollywood began exalting the living together, sex outside of marriage lifestyle.

Steven LeBlanc

Rumors of a September Strike Against Iran

Former CIA official Robert Baer believes a possible Israeli attack against Iran could happen in September. Baer who served over 20 years in the Middle East stated that a strike against Natanz and other nuclear facilities is once again being seriously considered.

Sources were not named in the Radio interview that took place on a Los Angeles Radio station. However, Baer has contacts within the Israeli security world who believe Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is determined to attack Iran in hopes of impairing Iran’s nuclear threat.

Baer said that “There is almost near certainty that Netanyahu is planning an attack (on Iran)… and it will probably be in September before the vote on a Palestinian state. And he’s also hoping to draw the United States into the conflict,” he stated.

No doubt a strike is being planned by Israel, but when it will take place is unknown. The Prime Minister’s office has not commented on the story. We continue to watch this story closely.

Steven LeBlanc

China's Massive Commodities Appetite

China has passed the U.S. to become the world’s biggest energy consumer.  This is no trite statistic.  China is the world’s top consumer of energy, metals and grains.

China’s appetite has been fueled not by consumer demand, as seen in America, but from energy-intense heavy industry and infrastructure building.  There seems to be no slowing down in the building sector for the foreseeable future.

China’s share of total world copper consumption has risen dramatically as well, reaching 40 percent, from about 22 percent in 2005, making China the world’s largest copper-consuming country.

Copper is not the only commodity where China is now the dominant consumer. Chinese consumption of aluminum has now outpaced the United States.  And… China now accounts for 60 percent of global iron ore consumption and 52 percent of coking coal demand.  As for oil, China is the world’s second-largest oil consumer, America being number one in that category.

Saudi Arabia, the world’s second biggest crude exporter, now ships more crude oil to China than to the United States.

If China should suddenly stumble economically…the world economy will falter creating panic in the world’s financial markets.   If China’s economy should overheat… commodity prices will move even higher and that means higher gas prices and higher consumer costs across the board, stalling an already anemic U.S. recovery.

China is a clear and present danger that threatens America’s economic supremacy.  Another sign that America is truly a “sunset” power.

Steven LeBlanc


A book review in the June 18-19 weekend Wall Street Journal brings into focus two horrific consequences of modern society’s demand for individual liberty of choice without moral absolutes.  The book being reviewed was Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys Over Girls and the Consequences of a World Full of Men written by Mara Hvistendahl.  The reviewer is Jonathan V. Last.  

The first consequence documented by the author is the shocking statistic about the choices being made by potential parents around the world.  The statistic shows that female fetuses are being aborted at a much higher rate than male fetuses.  According to the book, “Since the late 1970’s, a hundred-sixty-three million female babies have been aborted by parents seeking sons.”  This has occurred, not only in China and India where sexual selection is common, but throughout the world; especially in parts of the world that are without any cultural objections to the taking of human life in the womb.

The U.S. Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade essentially declared individual choice as the highest and most sacred civil liberty.  This is in opposition to the right to life stance for the unborn.  The second consequence of the demand for individual liberty, which stems from this decision, is demonstrated in Ms. Hvistendahl’s book as the review reveals how unquestioning the author and much of the global society have been convinced of this premise. 

From the Wall Street book review, it becomes clear the author is blinded to the fact that individual choice ungoverned by moral absolutes will eventually lead to horrific, unintended consequences that are destructive to the very meaning of being human. This blindness results from the author’s indefensible commitment to what she perceives is a woman’s right to take the life of her unborn child though the author cannot find place for the inevitable consequences of her stance. 

The author does try to offer some ways to correct the abortion-gender imbalance.   However, the author’s suggested way to protect some of the unborn females is not only absurd, it reveals her inability to grasp the fundamental truth that individual liberty without the restraint of moral absolutes corrupts society at its core.  The reviewer, Mr. Last, concludes his review with the following segment in a way that cannot be improved:

“’Choice is choice,’ one Indian abortionist tells Ms. Hvistendahl:  ‘I have patients who come and say I want to abort because if this baby is born, it will be a Gemini, but I want a Libra.’…This is where choice has already led.  Ms. Hvistendahl may wish the matter otherwise, but there are only two alternatives:  restrict abortion or accept the slaughter of millions of baby girls…”

While the author, Ms. Hvistendahl, decries the outcome of the unrestrained abortion ethic, one can only observe that once out of the bag who knows where the cat will run.  In this instance, it has run over the top of the women’s’ right to choose and bitten the faces of those who so vociferously lobby for that choice.

Spain: one woman killed every three days by domestic violence

On Sunday I was watching a roundtable discussion hosted by Christiane Amanpour on This Week. She had three women as guests one of which was Cecelia Attias, former wife of France’s President Nicholas Sarkozy. The discussion theme was that society would function better if more women occupied civic positions in society.

In support of this theory, Amanpour quoted the example of Rwanda. There, post the genocidal war of 1995 between Tutsi and Hutus, women now occupy at least 50% of the parliament and over 50% of President Kagame’s cabinet is female.  Now 16 years after the war, it seems that Rwanda is doing much better by all indicators – health, economics, etc – than its neighbouring nations. Amanpour put this statistic to Attias for comment and I suspect she was surprised, as were the other roundtable guests, by Attias’ answer.

Attias countered by refering to Spain. In Spain half the government is composed of women and women are involved in all levels of the community but it suffers from this astounding domestic violence record. The representation of women in civic society came about as a result of a Law on Gender Equality that was passed in 2004 by the newly elected government of socialist Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. The law provided among other things, that women should be appointed to key positions in the administration, created special courts and issued drastic instructions to crack down on domestic violence.  But still seven years later this appalling statistic persists.

Amanpour and Attias appeared to quickly agree that the problem might actually be from a different source in Spain – not a lack of women in civic society but instead, a lack of law enforcement. However, one has to ask, what more can be done? If the Prime Minister himself has issued precisely this directive “crack down on domestic violence”, and yet it persists, perhaps it is not enforcement that is the problem either.

Despite its strongly Catholic population, Spain is one of the more progressive, liberal societies in Europe. It is one of the few countries in the world where homosexuals can get married and it is called a marriage not a civil union. Homosexuals can also adopt children. Politicians also enjoy a degree of tolerance, not typically being required to resign for extra-marital affairs or for having visited a prostitute. National serious newspapers, such as El Pais or ABC, publish explicit adult advertisements on a daily basis and afternoon television – that is to say prime television viewing time for kids after school – commonly features sex scenes.

It is a small snapshot, but it paints a clear picture of attitudes between the sexes in Spain. With women marginalized from their essential roles in marriage and child-rearing, and its leaders granted implicit permission to betray their spouses without repercussions, perhaps it is this country’s attitude towards its women that is killing them?

Eye on Europe

© 2020 World Watch Today
Sitemap | Website by Noble Image